Citizen Portal
Sign In

After Home Rule petition stirred controversy, committee agrees to meet with city on facilities

Lowell School Committee · February 5, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following a City Council action to advance a Home Rule petition on facilities management, the School Committee voted to convene a joint facilities subcommittee with the City Council; members emphasized the need for transparency, union involvement and clear organizational charts before any consolidation.

The Lowell School Committee voted Feb. 4 to ask the school committee facilities subcommittee to meet with the City Council facilities subcommittee to discuss creation of a joint facilities department, following a contentious Home Rule petition at the City Council.

Mayor Gitscheer brought the motion, saying the council had moved forward with language about a Home Rule petition but that city members had paused to seek joint discussions. Public commenter Mister Hoey urged better coordination between city and schools, citing maintenance problems at specific schools and urging closer city–school collaboration.

Several committee members, including Miss McFadden and Miss Martin, said they supported a joint conversation but were concerned about the petition’s scope. McFadden said the draft petition as presented could consolidate financial, personnel and maintenance functions and that the committee should be an equal voice in any discussion. She and others emphasized that inclusion of unions, transparency, and protections for staff would be critical.

Member Bahu said a Home Rule petition effectively could deny the school committee its responsibilities if moved to the state without the committee’s input; he urged the council to delay submission. The mayor apologized on behalf of the City Council for the way the petition had advanced and said he hoped a facilities-subcommittee meeting would proceed before any state action.

The committee approved the request for a joint subcommittee meeting by roll call and recorded unanimous affirmative votes. Members said they did not intend the meeting to predetermine an outcome but to provide shared understanding about organizational charts, logistics, and union impacts before any Home Rule petition moved forward.