Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tuition Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears concern after Special School District advice to limit new tuition students to St. Louis County

Clayton School Board · February 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members reacted with concern after administration said legal counsel advised restricting future tuition students to St. Louis County to limit Special School District (SSD) FAPE liability; existing out-of-county tuition students will be grandfathered.

A consent-agenda item prompted intense discussion after administration explained a new practice: beginning next year, the district will no longer enroll new tuition-paying students who do not reside in St. Louis County. Administrators said legal counsel and the Special School District (SSD) advised that accepting new out-of-county tuition students could create unresolved liability for special-education services under FAPE (Free Appropriate Public Education).

Administrator Speaker 4 said the district has reviewed the matter with legal counsel and been advised that it may restrict enrollment of tuition students to those who reside in St. Louis County to protect the district from liability if specialized services are required. The board heard that the district currently has 23 tuition students who live outside the county; those students were described as "grandfathered" and may remain enrolled, though the district acknowledged there is some ongoing risk if future services are needed.

Board members voiced ethical and equity concerns. "I have some real heartburn around saying Saint Louis City kids... can't come and access our excellent school district," one member said, while another said the decision felt like an "unfunded liability" issue for the district. Members discussed alternatives, including the past practice of accepting students but clarifying eligibility for SSD services; administration said SSD refused to enroll out-of-county students and the district would have to hire its own specialized staff to assume those responsibilities.

The board ultimately left the item in the consent agenda and approved the consent block by voice vote, but several members asked administration to monitor the regional special-education landscape and consider reopening the policy if conditions change.