Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Outside counsel briefs TAC on Open Meetings Act: notice, minutes and remote participation
Summary
Robert Kidd of New Mexico Local Government Law gave an Open Meetings Act refresher to the MPO TAC covering 72‑hour agenda posting, minutes requirements, public recording rights, executive‑session exceptions, rolling quorums, and limits on telephonic participation.
Robert Kidd, counsel from New Mexico Local Government Law, gave a refresher on the state Open Meetings Act at the Mesilla Valley MPO TAC meeting on Feb. 5.
Kidd reviewed the Act’s transparency goals and practical requirements: agendas and notice (agendas must be made available 72 hours before a meeting), the minimum content of meeting minutes (date, time, place, members present, substance of proposals, votes and how each member voted), and the legal consequences when meetings occur without required notice. He advised that members of the public may record meetings so long as the recording does not disrupt proceedings and stressed that public comment periods are common but not a statutory requirement under the Act.
Kidd discussed exceptions that permit closed executive sessions—such as pending litigation, certain personnel matters or real estate transactions—and said a vote, citation of the statutory exception, and a clear topic description are required before convening such a session. He warned about rolling quorums and private conferral outside public meetings (emails, texts or notes) and explained enforcement mechanisms (Attorney General, district attorneys, or private litigants) and remedies that can include voiding actions taken without compliance.
Committee members asked no follow‑up questions during the presentation; Kidd closed by inviting questions and reminding members of best practices for public comment and minutes.
