Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Kratom Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee pauses kratom ban debate after hours of public comment, cites pending state hearings
Summary
After more than a dozen public speakers urged regulation rather than prohibition, the Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee voted to continue item 7 (a proposed local kratom ban) so the city can consider outcomes of pending state hearings and a forthcoming staff report.
The Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee voted to continue consideration of a proposed local ban on kratom after public commenters urged regulators to pursue a regulatory framework instead of prohibition.
Dozens of residents and business owners told the committee during public comment that kratom is used by many Angelenos as a harm-reduction tool or to manage chronic pain. Jackie Subek, executive director of 7 Hope Alliance, asked the committee "instead of rushing to prohibition and any kind of ban or criminalization, that we roll this back and do a proper study session similar to what we did with cannabis," and noted a California Senate Health Committee hearing scheduled for Feb. 18. Dan Arausa told the committee, "This is harm reduction that's actually working," describing how kratom helped him stop drinking alcohol.
The committee chair said continuing the item would allow the city to "hear what comes out of the state Senate hearings" and give the Chief Legislative Analyst time to prepare a staff report. The clerk then called the roll; Council members Harris Dawson, Jaroszewsky, and Sotomayor Martinez voted in favor, Council members Raman and Lee were absent, and the motion carried to continue items 7 (kratom) and 13 (secondary employment for peace officers) to dates to be determined.
Speakers who addressed item 7 urged regulatory approaches modeled on AB 1088 (age limits, lab testing, potency caps and labeling), or urged waiting for state action. Justin Wolf, a business owner, said the chief legislative analyst had already publicly endorsed AB 1088, and vendor Abdullah Mamoun displayed packaged samples during his remarks to distinguish "natural kratom leaf" from synthetic, high-potency adulterants.
Several speakers advanced claims about public-health outcomes that the committee did not substantiate during the meeting. Jackie Subek said Florida's ban was followed "within the first month, overdoses rose by 300 percent;" the committee did not provide supporting local data during the session. The record shows a range of personal testimony about benefits and risks but no formal local health-agency conclusions were presented.
The item will return to the committee after the state hearing and when the CLA's staff report is complete. No ordinance, ban, or regulatory language was adopted at this meeting.
