Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Design team lays out options, parking shortfall and rough costs for Great Crossing Park phase 2

Scott County Physical Court · February 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants presented high-level options for a 4- or 5-field complex at Great Crossing Park, discussed amphitheater siting, multi-use fields, parking needs (an estimated shortfall of roughly 274 spaces for a 5-field plan) and preliminary cost ranges; county staff will return with topo maps and a scope for a design contract.

A consultant team the court identified in the meeting (referred to in the transcript as Brandcenter Carroll) presented conceptual options for a second phase at Great Crossing Park and sought feedback on layout, amenities and costs.

Pat Hoagland, introduced by the consultants as a parks designer with extensive experience, discussed tradeoffs between a 4-field and a 5-field complex, stressing parking and grading constraints. Hoagland said a commonly used planning figure is about 60 parking spaces per field for tournament use and reported…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans