Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floodplain Buyouts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to provide state match for federal floodplain buyouts
Summary
The House committee recommended HB246 do pass after sponsors and witnesses described infrastructure damage in Lincoln County and the need to pair state money with federal Emergency Watershed Protection buyouts to restore floodplain land and reduce future disaster costs.
Representative Vincent, sponsor of House Bill 246, told the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee that the measure would provide state matching funds to political subdivisions that have already been approved for federal flood mitigation buyouts and rehabilitation of floodplain properties. “The intent of this bill is simple,” Vincent said: to help communities leverage federal dollars to permanently reduce flood risk and restore high‑risk floodplain land to its natural state.
Why it matters: Sponsor and witnesses framed HB246 as a narrowly targeted tool to speed locally approved federal buyouts and reduce repeated emergency response and reconstruction costs. County and state emergency officials said the program would offer a voluntary, dignified pathway for families to relocate from repeatedly flooded properties.
What supporters told the committee: Mark Fisher, Lincoln County commissioner and chair, described repeated flood damage in the Hondo Valley, including compromised sewer lines that temporarily discharged sewage to waterways, damaged wells and lost bridges. “Infrastructure was damaged … Millions and millions of dollars, untold hours that were expended,” Fisher said, urging the committee to reduce future risk. Allie Bridal, State Director for the Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, said the bill would “reduce future disaster costs, limit repetitive loss, and protect taxpayers” by avoiding rebuilding in places that will flood again.
How the program would work: Committee members pressed sponsors on valuation and anti‑donation concerns. Experts said the federal Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program requires a pre‑disaster appraisal to help make owners whole and enable relocation within the community; federal funding typically covers about 75% of eligible costs (with possible expanded 90% assistance for limited‑resource areas) and EWP rules drive the pre‑disaster valuation. State matching dollars would be structured to comply with constitutional limits, the sponsor said.
Committee action and next steps: A committee member moved a do‑pass recommendation on HB246; the motion was seconded and no opposition was voiced during the committee’s call for opposed. The committee closed public comment and advanced the bill to the floor with a do‑pass recommendation (no roll‑call tally was recorded in the transcript). The sponsor said communities will proceed with federal and state processes for appraisal and voluntary buyouts.
What remains unresolved: Members repeatedly asked for details on appraisal mechanics, the exact division of pre‑ and post‑disaster valuation for state versus federal contributions, and how the program will prioritize properties. Sponsors and witnesses said federal EWP rules and further agency coordination will govern those details.
