Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delegation reviews bill to let Frederick County craft producers sell peers' products
Summary
Delegation discussed a Senate "class L" bill that would allow Frederick County breweries and distilleries to sell beverages made by other Maryland craft manufacturers; sponsors said the measure aims to support local producers and language limiting sales to Maryland producers can be added.
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair Pippe opened discussion of a Senate "class L" bill intended to let Frederick County manufacturers sell products made by other Maryland craft beverage makers. The sponsor described the change as aimed at supporting local craft manufacturers: "...to give some support to our local manufacturers," and said the intent is to allow sales of other Maryland craft beverage or distillery products only.
Delegates pressed for clarification that the allowance would be limited to Maryland-based craft producers, not national brands. Delegate Chris Fair asked where the bill specifies the Maryland-only restriction; the sponsor said that language can and should be clarified and that it "would be added in there specifically." Delegate Ken Kerr warned of past resistance by licensed beverage distributors to a similar measure and asked if the sponsor had engaged that group; the sponsor said he had not yet but would meet with them before committee.
Chair Pippe outlined procedural options so the sponsor could meet the Senate filing deadline: the bill could be dropped in the sponsor's name, an amendment could be drafted and attached, and the delegation could send a letter of support. Members agreed to proceed so the sponsor can drop the bill and pursue amendments in committee; no formal recorded vote on a delegation letter was recorded during this segment.
The delegation asked staff to circulate any correspondence received from the liquor board and the Alcohol, Tobacco and Cannabis Commission for members' review. The group emphasized that any final delegation letter should explicitly state the Maryland-only intent when that language is finalized in committee.

