Rutherford County Board approves routine contracts and facility projects, denies two student transfers under disciplinary policy
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
At its Feb. 12 meeting the Rutherford County Board of Education approved a package of routine personnel, curriculum and facilities items and denied two requests to admit transfer students who were under disciplinary action, citing district policy 6.318.
The Rutherford County Board of Education on Feb. 12 approved a slate of routine personnel, curriculum and facilities items and denied two transfer-student admission requests related to disciplinary findings.
In procedural business the board unanimously approved the meeting agenda and consent agenda by voice vote. Later, the board approved a recommended signing-bonus incentive for 2026–27 as presented by human resources.
Under legal items, the board considered two transfer-student cases. In the first, staff told trustees the student had been expelled for possession of drugs; the director of schools recommended denial under district policy 6.318 and the board voted to deny the admission. In the second case, staff said the transfer involved a student expelled for possession of a weapon or dangerous object; the director again recommended denial under policy 6.318 and the board denied admission.
On curriculum and instruction trustees approved formation of a career-and-technical-education (CTE) textbook-adoption committee to review CTE materials and return recommendations to the board. The board also approved special-course requests for 2026–27 under state rule 0520-1-3, listing new and renewal offerings such as advanced grammar, fine-arts appreciation, intro to linguistics, infectious-diseases and neuroscience-related courses; commissioner of education approval is required later in the process, staff said.
Trustees approved several facilities- and athletics-related projects. The board approved an agreement among Wilson Bank & Trust, Riverdale High School and the Riverdale Baseball Booster Club for a video-scoreboard and signage partnership. Principals requested and received board approval to use booster or school athletic funds for local projects: a replacement baseball fence at Eagleville (project not to exceed $18,000, no cost to the board), relocation of an existing scoreboard from Segal High to Whitworth Buchanan (replacement-support costs anticipated not to exceed $3,000), and purchase of permanent soccer goals for Smyrna Primary using fundraiser funds (cost: $6,757.08). The board also approved an ROTC obstacle-course installation at Smyrna High to be funded by CTE monies (estimated cost not to exceed $4,000). Engineering and construction staff reviewed these requests and raised no objections for the projects presented.
Most votes during the meeting were taken by voice with trustees saying “aye”; no roll-call tallies were recorded in the meeting transcript. The board adjourned after routine general discussion and announcements.
What happens next: the CTE textbook committee will review materials and return recommendations to the board; several projects will move forward under the funding sources noted (school/booster funds or CTE funds).
