Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals panel reviews divorce ruling that ordered large pension share and sanctions
Summary
In Kankade v. Kankade (20P684) the appellant challenged a trial court order compelling a 100% joint-and-survivor annuity election and transfer of 65% of the central pension fund, arguing those measures unfairly reduced his income; the appellee defended the award as an equitable response to alleged dissipation and sanctions.
Justice Peter Sachs presiding. The court considered multiple challenges in a divorce appeal, including the trial judge’s order that the husband elect a 100% joint-and-survivor annuity and transfer 65% of his central pension fund interest to the wife, fines for a missed trial day and the allocation of insurance and tax obligations.
Appellant counsel Jake…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
