Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission urges council to delay sunsetting of Downtown Action Plan advisory committee so members can be heard
Summary
The Planning Commission voted to recommend against approval of PC 17‑121 — which would repeal the Downtown Action Plan Advisory Committee from the LDRs — until current committee members are notified and given an opportunity to present to City Council; commissioners cited surprise that members were not informed and raised concerns about quorum and the committee’s past accomplishments.
The North Miami Planning Commission on Feb. 3 recommended that the City Council not proceed immediately with PC 17‑121, an ordinance that would repeal Article 2 Division 4 of the Land Development Regulations and sunset the Downtown Action Plan Advisory Committee. By roll‑call vote the commission directed staff to ensure current committee members are notified and offered the opportunity to provide input to the council before action proceeds.
Debbie Love, Community Planning and Development Director, told the commission staff was following a city manager’s office annual review that identified inactive or underperforming boards for possible sunsetting. "We are striking in its entirety Article 2 Division 4," Love said, describing the code change staff would bring to council for first and second readings in March.
Multiple commissioners and a committee member said they were surprised by the proposal and by a lack of direct notice. One committee member described recent accomplishments and regular meetings: "We were instrumental in creating the Liberty Park... We have been meeting on a regular basis," he said, and added he had been unaware of the sunset proposal until seeing it on the agenda. Commissioners raised practical concerns about quorum, lack of a budget historically for the committee, and whether there are alternative forums for stakeholder input as downtown projects proceed.
Several commissioners suggested either tabling the ordinance or, instead, recommending against approval while requesting that the council hear testimony from existing members. Planning Commission members refined and adopted a recommendation "against approval until further input is heard by the committee," and the motion passed on a unanimous roll‑call vote recorded in the transcript.
Next steps: staff said the ordinance is tentatively scheduled for City Council first reading on March 10 and second reading on March 24; the Planning Commission asked staff to notify committee members of the council hearing dates so they may appear and make a case to the council prior to any city action to sunset the committee.
