Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee tables bill to let some children younger than 5 be evaluated for early kindergarten entry
Summary
The House Education Committee heard hours of testimony on HB 12-82 (a proposal to allow school boards to evaluate children born just after the Sept.1 cutoff for early kindergarten entry). Committee debated funding, screening consistency and potential effects on daycare; members ultimately moved the bill to the 41st day and tabled it for further work.
The House Education Committee took extensive testimony on House Bill 12-82, which would let school boards adopt policies to evaluate children with birthdays after Sept. 1 for early kindergarten admission. Sponsor Representative Kathy Rice said the measure is intended to give families flexibility for children who have pre-K preparation and appear ready. Multiple parents and teachers described individual readiness cases.
Opponents including Education Secretary Joe Graves and the South Dakota Education Association cautioned that districts can already admit younger children in some cases but cannot claim them for certified enrollment and funding; they warned that permitting more early admissions without funding could create a fiscal and administrative burden and that inconsistent screening tools across districts could create inequities. Kindergarten teacher Jennifer Machesky stressed developmental and classroom-management concerns for adding four-year-olds to a modern kindergarten schedule.
The committee discussed an amendment moving the candidate cutoff from Sept.1 to Oct.1 and debated whether a uniform state screening instrument or funding changes would be needed. After debate members moved procedural options; transcript records show motions to place the bill on the 41st day and to table it. The chair announced the bill was tabled for further consideration.
Because the bill would allow boards to adopt policies rather than mandate enrollment, supporters said it preserves local discretion; critics said without funding and standardized instruments districts will be unlikely to implement options for early entry.
