Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Surveyor presents reconstruction priorities; board reviews drainage records and collection policy
Summary
Surveyor/staff presented the drainage reconstruction list highlighting Orville and EP Griffin as major projects, described outlet elevation challenges on EP Griffin and cleanup of non-maintenance records, and reported 224 drains flagged for collection under a 75% threshold.
At the Feb. 5 meeting the surveyor/staff presented an updated reconstruction list and project-status report for county drains.
Staff said two large projects — the Orville project and the EP Griffin project — are at the top of the reconstruction list and pose specific engineering challenges, particularly at outlets and locations that remain underwater. For the EP Griffin project staff described a possible approach to raise outlet elevation by extending a discharge ditch east under County Road 17 and cautioned about potential road overtopping on the west side of County Road 17. Staff said some options may require pumps or additional engineering to avoid persistent water backing into the drainage system.
The surveyor/staff also described a records-cleanup effort on the non-maintenance drain list: removing entries that lacked account numbers, combining drains already merged, and correcting records for drains that had been vacated but remained listed. Staff said they reviewed historical minutes and records to reconcile those entries and invited board members to review the spreadsheets in the surveyor's office.
On assessment policy, staff reported 224 drains were flagged for collection this year. They explained the board's collection policy: collection is triggered when a drain fund falls below a stated threshold (discussed as 75% in the meeting), and state code allows collection spanning up to four years for negative drains. Staff confirmed the certification list will be sent to the treasurer and auditors for billing.
Board members asked clarifying questions about parcel counts per watershed (some included up to about 35 parcels) and about a specific drain (Frank Yard Lateral 27-42) that was set at a 50% collection level; staff recorded that in meeting notes.
The board provided no new direction to change the overall reconstruction priorities at this meeting beyond continuing design work and permitting coordination; larger projects will proceed as crops are harvested and as scheduling and funding permit.
