Hendrick Hudson Board weighs tax-levy choices as reserves shrink after Indian Point revenue loss

Hendrick Hudson Central School District Board of Education · February 6, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board heard a financial update showing an initial state-aid increase of $124,000 versus $650,000 expected, discussed five budget scenarios and a 10-year forecast that shows reserves could be exhausted within a few years without changes.

HENDRICK HUDSON, N.Y. — The Hendrick Hudson Central School District Board of Education on Feb. 4 examined five budget scenarios and framed a choice between using fund balance or asking voters for a higher tax levy to avoid program cuts.

Assistant to the superintendent for financial stability Jill (last name variably transcribed) told the board the district now expects “only a mere $124,000 extra over last year’s state aid,” far below the $650,000 the district had anticipated. She said the district planned to use $4.4 million of fund balance last year but is on pace to use about $3.3 million in the current year, which will accelerate reserve depletion.

Why it matters: trustees and staff said the district lost about $25 million in revenue after the Indian Point plant shutdown and that continued reliance on reserves would put programs at risk over the next several years. The board viewed a middle ground between the tax-cap-compliant option and higher-levy scenarios as the likeliest path to preserve both services and some reserves.

Details: Jill presented five scenarios that balance different mixes of tax levy increases and fund-balance use. The district’s tax-cap-compliant option would produce a levy around $56 million (a 2.86% levy change) and rely on roughly $9.5 million of fund balance, leaving about $17.1 million in reserves under that scenario. Board members asked for more granular comparisons of the taxable liability for homes at $350,000, $500,000 and $700,000 in the district’s two taxing towns.

Board response: Several board members urged caution on using reserves. One member summarized the trade-off: lower immediate tax increases may conserve day-to-day affordability but will accelerate reserve depletion and could cause larger increases later. Another board member suggested a levy range between about 4.57% and 6.4% as a compromise and noted the community accepted a 4.57% levy in the prior budget vote.

Next steps: The district will file a preliminary tax-cap report with the state by March 1. Staff will open a “ThoughtExchange” or similar community feedback tool and host public meet-and-greets (Feb. 25; March 11; April 7 with a virtual option) ahead of the May 19 budget vote. The board asked staff to include the scenario slides and a clear disclaimer that figures are based on current assessed values and equalization rates.

Provenance: Budget scenarios and state-aid figures were discussed throughout the financial presentation (topicintro: SEG 603; topfinish: SEG 758).