Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oklahoma City advisory board reviews complaint process, reports letters of support after closed session
Summary
The Community Public Safety Advisory Board read its purpose, reviewed objectives for policing oversight, entered a closed session and returned to report letters of support for specific case numbers; no public comments were made and routine motions to approve minutes and close the meeting were recorded.
The Community Public Safety Advisory Board met in Oklahoma City and opened its session with cochair William Teeter reading the board's purpose and objectives, saying: "Purpose of the Community Public Safety Advisory Board is to serve as a permanent independent committee in Oklahoma City that will review the complaint investigative process and results of completed investigations involving Oklahoma City public safety officers."
The board's stated objectives, read aloud by Teeter, include reviewing departmental and administrative investigations (including complaints alleging excessive use of force), reviewing other public-concern incidents involving public safety employees, providing comments and recommendations to the Oklahoma City Chief of Police on OKCPD policy and procedure, and participating in public forums to inform the community about policing issues.
Teeter asked the board to approve the minutes from the previous meeting; an unidentified board member said, "So moved." The transcript does not record a second or a roll-call vote for that motion.
Teeter then gave instructions for public comment and reminded residents that while they may speak about complaints or compliments regarding the police department, there is a formal complaint process for specific cases and board members should refrain from extended dialogue with speakers except to ask clarifying questions. He asked whether anyone had signed up to speak; no public commenters were recorded.
The board entered a closed session and later concluded it. After returning, the transcript records staff reporting on case number "2025916O5" and noting letters of support or recommendation for several items, recorded in the transcript as: "20 25 10 14 0 1, a letter of recommendation. 20 25 10 14-02, letter of support. 20 25 10 14-03, and (202) 510-1404, a letter of support." The transcript does not provide additional detail about the substance of those reports.
Teeter moved to close the meeting; an unidentified member moved to close and another unidentified member seconded. The transcript records the second but does not include a roll-call vote; the chair thanked attendees, and no further business was recorded.
