Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appellee flags inconsistencies in technical record and exhibit timestamps
Summary
Appellee counsel told the appellate panel that the technical record lists five exhibits despite trial transcripts noting no exhibits were entered; counsel questioned inconsistent file stamps and notarization dates, urging the court to disregard exhibits it did not consider.
COURT OF APPEALS — At the May 13, 2024 argument in the appeal of the dismissal of an indictment, Kendall Jones, counsel for appellee Mr. Mason, urged the panel to treat certain exhibits in the technical record with skepticism, saying their inclusion and timestamps raise questions about the accuracy of the record before the court.
Jones told the panel that three trial transcripts state explicitly that the State entered no exhibits during the three trial settings, yet the technical record contains a separate exhibits volume listing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
