Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the It Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Jefferson County weighs higher-cost on-site IT contract, cites cybersecurity risks

Jefferson County commissioners and Jefferson County Council · February 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County leaders said they will solicit a proposal from a vendor that provides an on-site technician and expanded cybersecurity services, and acknowledged the new contract will cost more than the current provider (about $10,000/month).

Jefferson County leaders opened a discussion about upgrading the county’s IT services, saying a proposed contract with an outside vendor would add on‑site technicians and formal cybersecurity protections.

“Over the years IT has become an important deal,” Speaker 3 said, arguing the county needs someone on site rather than waiting for a remote technician to arrive. He warned that the county holds “a lot of public information” and said the risk of data being seized or held for ransom made stronger defenses a priority: “We don't need to have that taken and then held for ransom,” he said.

Speakers said the county currently pays about $10,000 per month (roughly $120,000 annually) to the incumbent provider but that the new proposal — discussed under a vendor name mentioned in the meeting as “Exos”— would be more expensive because it would hire a local on‑site technician and add cybersecurity services. Speaker 4 said the vendor’s draft proposal includes cybersecurity measures and that county staff will circulate the proposal for review.

Several participants urged the boards to treat cybersecurity as a public‑safety matter. Speaker 6 and others described recent, sector‑wide incidents that exploited unexpected systems (for example, HVAC controls) and urged robust vulnerability scanning and ongoing monitoring.

The boards did not approve a vendor at the meeting. Officials said staff will share the vendor’s written proposal and an estimate of recurring costs, and that they will seek competitive options before a final procurement decision.