Preliminary budget review shows ~$7.8M gap; medical benefits and special‑ed tuition are major drivers

Carlisle Area School District Board · February 6, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff presented a draft 2026–27 operational budget near $124–126M and said the district currently faces roughly a $7.8M gap before possible state funding; key cost pressures include wages/benefits, medical premiums, special‑education and charter tuition, and a near‑term debt‑service spike tied to planned borrowing.

Finance staff presented the board with an early look at the 2026–27 fiscal picture, flagging cost pressures and a preliminary gap that will shape upcoming budget deliberations.

Business office staff said the draft operational expense runs roughly $124–126 million. Key cost drivers include projected wage increases, a notable projected rise in medical benefits (staff noted prior premiums rose ~10% on Jan. 1, 2025 and projected plan changes could produce a larger year‑over‑year budget impact), and a projected 26% increase in special‑education tuition expenses. The presentation also included charter school tuition increases and a planned phase‑2 borrowing that produces a near‑term debt‑service spike: total debt service for next year was shown at about $9.6 million, representing roughly 7.6% of the budget.

The business office estimated a budget gap of approximately $7.8 million under current revenue assumptions. If the governor’s recently proposed education budget were fully funded and passed as proposed, the district staff said roughly $2.3 million of additional state aid could be realized — reducing the gap but not eliminating it. Board and staff agreed a line‑by‑line review will occur in April and that administration will return with refinement of assumptions and potential cost‑savings options.

The committee discussed timing: May is the typical moment for a proposed final budget followed by June adoption. Administration said it will continue internal conversations on priorities — including potential additions for math interventions or other student supports — and will bring concrete proposals back to the board.

No final budget vote occurred at the committee meeting; staff will return as timelines progress.