Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fee Schedule topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ashland County staff propose fee‑schedule updates; addressing categories to be added

Ashland County Zoning and Land Committee · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed updates to zoning fees to align with neighboring counties and to add several 911/addressing application types to the official schedule; addressing coordinator and intake staff recommended keeping standard application fees and adding distinct categories for replacement signs, nontaxable land and private road names.

County staff told the zoning committee they plan to update the Ashland County zoning fee schedule to align with neighboring counties and to include several address/911 application types that are currently in practice but not listed on the schedule.

Britney, who coordinates addressing, explained there are multiple application types: (1) address assignment on taxable county land; (2) nontaxable land or reservation lands at reduced cost; (3) replacement sign/post requests; and (4) private road name applications, which include a town share for the physical sign. She recommended adding these categories to the official fee schedule rather than increasing the standard application fee.

Carisha, who receives applications, told the committee the county hears frequent complaints about fees and supports not raising the standard application fee; she described the workflow (GPS point collection, sign ordering, and installation by highway or town crews) and the staff time required. Committee members discussed consolidating similar fees (e.g., sanitary permit renewal/transfer) and affirmed adding the addressing categories to the schedule. Staff noted they will propose modest increases on certain print/map services where imagery raises costs and recommended leaving rarely used boathouse fees in place.

The committee asked staff to prepare revised fee language and a table for future action; no vote was taken on a final fee schedule at this meeting.