Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board forwards restricted opioid-abatement allocation to county budget; vote recorded

Rutherford County Opioid Abatement Board · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board approved forwarding the year’s restricted allocation and letter of agreement to the county budget office and authorized the mayor to accept the funds; roll-call votes recorded seven 'Yes' votes and the motion passed. Staff reported restricted disbursement of $789,008.23 and remaining restricted balance of about $37,007.71.

The Rutherford County opioid-abatement board on Wednesday approved a motion to forward the year’s restricted allocation and letter of agreement to the county budget office and to authorize the mayor to sign and accept the funds.

A board member moved to forward the allocation to budget and the motion was seconded. The board then conducted a roll-call style confirmation in which those present were recorded as voting in favor: Commissioner Reed (Yes), Commissioner Peay (Yes), Kelly Haley (Yes), Trish Breeding (Yes), Lori Flippo (Yes), William Cope (Yes) and Chairman Harris (Yes). The chair declared the motion passed.

Financial context: Melissa (staff) presented the monthly financial report and said the board reimbursed about $147,000 in January, bringing total reimbursements since July 1 to about $853,005.89. She reported restricted funds left to allocate at roughly $37,007.71 and unrestricted funds of a little more than $1.6 million. Melissa said the annual restricted disbursement figure in the letter of agreement is $789,008.23.

Board discussion focused on the board’s exposure to future cuts and recurring obligations. Members noted the organization has historically funded recurring contracts — for example with MTSU and local law-enforcement programs — and warned that the county’s anticipated reduction of roughly $800,000 to its opioid-abatement stream will require planning for alternative funding scenarios.

What’s next: staff will forward the letter of agreement and supporting documents to the county budget office per the motion; board members urged close coordination during upcoming budget deliberations in April–June.