Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Proclamation Gender Inclusivity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Philomath council declines amendment to remove gender‑expression language from Women’s History Month proclamation
Summary
A proposal to remove language referencing gender expression from Philomath’s Women’s History Month proclamation failed 5–1 after council debate about inclusion, committee roles and what language reflects the proclamation’s purpose.
The Philomath City Council on March 10 rejected an amendment that would have removed references to gender expression from the city’s Women’s History Month proclamation and then approved the proclamation as drafted.
Councilor Brent Casement moved to strike lines 16–19 of the draft proclamation, arguing the document should focus on women and that discussion of gender expression belonged on other platforms. "I recommend we revise or amend the proclamation to omit lines 16 through 19," the mover said during the meeting.
Councilor Jessica Andrade and others strongly opposed the change, saying removing the lines would further marginalize groups that the inclusivity committee sought to include. "I highly recommend that we do not remove these lines. It is very important that we do not further ostracize people who are already discriminated against," Andrade said.
Councilors also debated whether committee names should appear in the formal "resolved" clauses. Councilor Risa Nielsen said including the inclusivity committee as a named participant in the whereas clauses felt awkward because committee members are not elected officials and council proclamations are by the elected body. Staff and councilors discussed a future policy to standardize when committee names are called out in proclamations.
After debate, the motion to remove the language failed on a 5–1 vote. Council then moved, on a separate motion, to approve Resolution 25‑04 (the Women’s History Month proclamation) as written; that motion passed 5–1.
Why it matters: the exchange underscores local debate over how municipal proclamations recognize identity and which community groups are explicitly named in formal documents. The council’s vote kept inclusive language in the proclamation and prompted a separate discussion about a consistent policy for how committee recommendations are recorded.
What’s next: staff said it will take counsel’s guidance on whether to change the standard proclamation template and will discuss the inclusivity committee’s role in further policy work. The proclamation will be read in the agreed form and implemented for March 2025 observances.
