Board debates 2027–28 calendar; some members call proposed start date unacceptable
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The board discussed a draft 2027–28 calendar recommended by the calendar committee and presented by Dr. Knowlton; the committee’s favored start date (Thursday the 12th) met the board’s criteria but drew strong objections from at least one member, and the calendar will return for action Feb. 17.
Dr. Knowlton presented the draft 2027–28 school calendar on Feb. 2, explaining the calendar‑committee process and three long‑standing criteria used to construct calendars: balance between semesters by attendance days (no greater than an eight‑day imbalance), a preference for a later August start where feasible, and having high‑school finals completed before winter break. The committee recommended a Thursday start on Aug. 12 based on survey responses.
The presentation explained how the three criteria interact and why the committee favored the 12th. Dr. Knowlton said the committee includes parents, union representatives, building administrators and district administrators and that the recommendation reflected committee feedback and historical practice.
Board discussion raised practical concerns about the proposed schedule’s impact on families. Board member Holly Blastick said the draft calendar did not reflect family needs and raised childcare and summer planning issues, urging an alternative start that would preserve more summer time. At one point Blastick said the calendar as presented was "a nonstarter to me," explaining that losing August family time and the lack of childcare options in late May and early June would create problems for families and for high‑school registration logistics.
Why it matters: Calendar dates shape family planning, childcare availability and the rhythm of the school year; board policy guidance and committee priorities will drive the next iteration.
Next steps: The calendar will return to the board for action at the Feb. 17 meeting; board members requested more alternatives and a possible reconsideration of the three‑criteria weighting.
Sources: Presentation and discussion with Dr. Knowlton; board member comments, Feb. 2, 2026.