Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears slow FEMA process for Ballast Point Pier replacement; staff estimates multi-year timeline
Summary
City staff told council FEMA funding means replacement of Ballast Point Pier will follow major-project procurement rules and could take several years; RFQ values were cited at $14–$17 million and staff estimated roughly three to four years for design and construction under FEMA oversight.
City staff told Tampa City Council that replacing the Ballast Point Pier will be a FEMA-guided major project and is likely to be a multi-year undertaking.
Mike Perry, deputy chief financial officer, said the city requested a FEMA authorization to proceed and that FEMA’s review of a major project requires careful oversight of every step of the procurement and design process. "A major project is one that cost more than $1,000,000," Perry said, and the design-bid process and FEMA review will extend the timeline. Perry told council that staff had short-listed design-build firms and that procurements and FEMA approval will take time. The request-for-qualifications the city posted lists an estimated project value in the $14 million–$17 million range.
When the council asked for a rough completion estimate, Perry said the schedule is uncertain under FEMA rules but offered a working estimate: "It's probably gonna take maybe a year to 18 months to design and then maybe up to 2 years to construct... I'll go between 3 to 4 years." That estimate accounted for FEMA’s required reviews and design-bid procurement steps.
Parks staff and insurance adjusters will inspect the site and coordinate immediate mitigation; Parks staff reported an upcoming insurance-adjuster and maintenance supervisor inspection to begin repairs or replacement planning. Parks staff also flagged that contingency funds are reserved for some park amenities and that the city does not expect to spend the full contingency on nonstructural items.
Councilors pressed for clearer public messaging after a city news release that did not specify FEMA’s involvement. Several council members said the release implied the project would begin soon, and staff agreed to be more explicit that FEMA approval is required before construction begins.
What’s next: Staff will continue coordination with FEMA, finalize design-build short-listing, meet with the insurance adjuster and provide updates to council as FEMA authorizations move forward. The city cautioned the public that the timetable is contingent on FEMA approvals and procurement steps.
