Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Seawalls And Shoreline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission asks Planning Board to study code change allowing hard paths to seawalls

Town of Highland Beach Town Commission · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission referred a Planning Board motion to consider amending the town code to allow limited hard-surface walking paths and seawall caps to extend seaward of property lines where no preexisting seawall exists, citing safety and access but raising questions about width, maintenance and erosion.

At the Feb. 3 meeting the Town Commission voted to refer a Planning Board–initiated proposal to amend section 30‑66(c)(1)(a) of the Town Code to the Planning Board for study. The proposed change would allow certain hard surfaces — for example, a narrow paved path — to continue seaward to the seawall cap where a new seawall is placed beyond a property line and no existing seawall sits at the property line.

Town planner Ingrid Allen described the background: a Planning Board special-exception approval for a property at 2564 South Ocean Boulevard included a seawall cap and a dock, and staff recommended clarifying the code to allow hard-surface access in narrow gaps between the property line and seawall cap when appropriate. Planning Board member Greg Bobby and commissioners said the change is primarily to improve safe, continuous access to docks (for carts and equipment) and to avoid a soft-surface gap that complicates handling heavy objects. Commissioners discussed environmental oversight, who would own or maintain the narrow strip between the property line and seawall, and whether the town or property owner would bear maintenance and liability. Staff said permitting remains the town's purview and suggested maintenance responsibility should rest with the property owner; the town also noted state and federal agencies (Florida Department of Environmental Protection and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) regulate seawall construction.

Commissioners asked the Planning Board to consider limits on the width and materials of any permitted path and whether an extension should be a one-time allowance tied to replacement seawalls. The commission carried a motion to send the draft amendment and related questions to the Planning Board for further study and recommended return with recommended conditions.