Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House General Laws committee advances bill limiting right-of-way reimbursements to labor costs
Summary
The House General Laws Committee adopted a House Committee Substitute that restricts reimbursements to labor costs and adds "bad actor" language, then voted 8-4 to advance House Bill 21-55 out of committee. Supporters said moving the bill keeps negotiations alive; opponents faulted unpredictability of labor-cost calculations and lack of a dispute mechanism.
The House Committee on General Laws on Tuesday adopted a House Committee Substitute (HCS) and voted 8-4 to advance House Bill 21-55, a measure that narrows reimbursement for moving utilities in public rights-of-way to labor costs and adds language excluding projects placed outside a right-of-way from eligibility.
Committee chair summarized the substitute, saying, "The only cost subject to the reimbursement would be the cost associated with the labor," and noted the HCS adds a 90-day information-sharing requirement and a "bad actor" provision intended to exclude ineligible installations. The committee first adopted the HCS by voice vote before taking the do-pass motion on the bill.
Members questioned how labor costs would be verified and what recourse local governments would have if they disputed providers' cost estimates. Representative Hurlburt of District 8 stated, "there's not any separate mechanism in this or would just go through any standard civil process at that point," indicating the bill does not create a specialized dispute-resolution path.
Representative Matheson, who detailed a long history of skepticism about the underlying policy, said they would vote to advance the bill despite concerns. "I'm gonna be a yes on the bill today because I wanna keep the conversation going," Matheson said, urging continued negotiation between municipalities and service providers and promising to seek clearer protections or amendments before the House floor.
Opponents raised practical concerns that basing reimbursement on labor alone could be manipulated or could leave municipalities without a fair mechanism when routing changes after work is complete. After debate, the committee conducted a roll call and recorded eight yes votes and four no votes; the chair declared the motion passed, moving the bill out of committee.
The measure will now proceed in the legislative process to the full House for further consideration, where members said they expect continued negotiation and possible amendments. The committee adjourned with no additional action.
