Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves piggyback procurement after police present $4.1M Axon consolidation; resident asks for visibility of taxpayer dollars
Summary
Council approved a piggyback contract (motion named 'Exxon Enterprise, Inc.') after Chief McKinley described a proposed five‑year consolidation of Axon services for body cameras, tasers, FUSUS and drone integration totaling $4.1 million; a resident urged the city to ensure taxpayers can 'see the product.'
The Apopka City Council voted unanimously on Dec. 18 to approve a piggyback procurement after a presentation by Police Chief Mike McKinley outlining a proposed consolidation of the city's Axon contracts for body‑worn cameras, tasers, evidence storage (FUSUS), and drone data integration.
Chief McKinley told the council the consolidated five‑year proposal would purchase 150 body‑worn cameras and tasers, anticipate modest annual growth allowances, and lock pricing to avoid steeper future increases. "The proposed five year contract totals $4,100,000," McKinley said, arguing that renewing separately later could push total costs above $5 million. He cited features intended to enhance officer safety and oversight, including a "watch me" button for supervisors, extended battery life for 12‑hour shifts, bidirectional communications, and an updated taser (Taser 10) with longer effective range.
McKinley also described training and software benefits, saying the negotiated arrangement included virtual reality training headsets and a reduced FUSUS rate: "We secured a rate of $70,000 per year for the contract's duration," he said, noting earlier FUSUS pricing was about $65,000 and had been forecast to rise.
During public comment, resident Leroy Bell (Beall) told the council that equipment purchases are paid from taxpayer dollars and asked that residents be able to "see the product" they are funding, and referenced concerns about taser safety in earlier incidents. "If they're paying for something...the taxpayers need to see the product of these cameras," he said.
The motion recorded in the meeting minutes asked the council to "approve the piggyback contract for the signed terms for Exxon Enterprise, Inc." and passed by voice vote. The transcript records a procedural motion naming Exxon Enterprise, Inc.; the chief’s presentation, however, described a consolidation with Axon Incorporated and related services. The council did not pause the motion to reconcile the naming during the meeting; staff later indicated budget coverage and payment‑timing arrangements would mitigate immediate fiscal impact.
What happens next: Staff indicated the existing budget allocation covers part of the first year and that remaining costs would be spread over subsequent years; the council asked city staff to provide detailed accounting and confirmed residents will receive normal retention and assessment reports where applicable.
