Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheltenham School District revises weapons‑notification language to match state law
Summary
The district presented revisions to Policy 2 18.2 and related policies to implement a new state requirement that families be notified when incidents involving weapons (including local policy violations such as replicas or look‑alikes) occur; the board discussed implementation and communications but did not vote on policy adoption this evening.
The Cheltenham School District policy committee reviewed revisions to Policy 2 18.2 on student weapons and related cross‑references on Tuesday, saying the updates are intended to align district practice with a recent change in state law that requires family notification after incidents involving weapons.
Committee lead said the changes expand the delegation language to require notifications when an incident involving weapons occurs on school premises, during extracurricular activities, or during transportation. “The district needs to send out notification to families,” the presenter said. The presenter added the revisions clarify that incidents that violate local policy — including replicas, toy weapons and look‑alikes — are included under the notification requirement.
Board member Zachary Epps, who has followed recent notifications in the district, said he supports compliance but urged care in implementation so notices do not create an unintended impression that school safety is deteriorating. “I just don't want these notifications … to create a sense of lack of safety that might not be there,” Epps said, urging an intentional communications plan to reinforce existing safety measures.
Staff told the committee that Mr. Kaufman drafted a community communication to set expectations for families about the kinds of incidents that will trigger notices. The related policy 3 56 was edited to add that the superintendent or designee will ensure the required notifications go out and to cross‑reference Policy 2 18.2 so notification language can be updated centrally if the law changes.
No formal vote on these policy revisions occurred at the meeting; staff said the policies will return for the board's routine readings and action at a future meeting. Next steps include finalizing the family communication and returning the policies to the committee for a formal first reading.
