Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Roads topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Knox County delays Y Way Lane closure after residents and fire officials raise access, litigation concerns

Knox County Commission · February 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission postponed a decision on a proposed partial closure of Y Way Lane (District 9) for 90 days after residents, emergency responders and commissioners debated emergency access, TDOT condemnation history, utility easements and owners' plans to build; the postponement passed 11-0.

A contentious proposal to close a portion of Y Way Lane in District 9 prompted emotional testimony from residents and extended commissioner debate before the Knox County Commission voted to postpone the decision for 90 days.

At public forum, Jason Whitsell and residents Larry and Emily Gray described the closure request and its effect on emergency access and property use. Whitsell explained the proposal would close “approximately 107 feet of County Road” at Y Way Lane’s end and noted a water line and utility easement in the affected area. Larry Gray described a multidecade family home and said, ‘‘If I could have that road, I’d have enough room to build another house’’ so a family member could live nearby.

County engineering staff told the commission utilities would retain easements if the road were closed and that any property owner seeking to build on a vacated right‑of‑way would need to coordinate and pay for utility relocations. Commissioners discussed pending litigation with the Tennessee Department of Transportation related to prior condemnation and the practical effects of any future TDOT action on current parcel boundaries.

Multiple commissioners urged caution. Rural Metro’s initial letter expressed concerns about losing emergency access; a follow‑up email softened some of those concerns but did not remove them. Engineering presented a map showing two distinct closure areas — a linear portion of the roadway and an unbuilt turnaround platted as a cul‑de‑sac — and commissioners debated options ranging from closing only the unused platted turnaround to closing a portion after an adjacent property line. Commissioner Russell offered an amendment to keep access to the Whitsells’ property while closing the road beyond that point; the amendment failed for lack of a second.

Faced with competing owner interests and the need for an updated survey, the commission voted unanimously to postpone action for 90 days to allow for surveys, further engineering review and direct meetings among county staff and the affected property owners. Director Jim Snow (Engineering) said a survey and a follow-up planning session could provide the information needed to identify a compromise that preserves emergency access while addressing the Grays’ development interest.

The postponement passed 11‑0. County staff said they will schedule site surveys and meet with both parties and Commissioner Fox to attempt to reach common ground before the item returns.