Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: working group actions on seclusion recommendations (Jan. 21, 2016)

Legislative Working Group on Seclusion (Minnesota) · January 22, 2026

Summary

Summary of motions and roll‑call outcomes from the Jan. 21 working group: recommendation c passed (7–5); recommendations b, d and e failed on 6–6 ties; minutes were approved at the start of the meeting.

The working group recorded the following formal actions on Jan. 21 while drafting its report to the legislature:

- Approval of prior meeting minutes: motion made and adopted at start of meeting (procedural approval).

- Recommendation b (amend Minn. Stat. chapter 125A to add explicit parental written consent provisions, trigger new IEP meetings after repeated seclusion, and require MDE outreach and a streamlined complaint process): roll call 6 ayes, 6 nos, 4 absent — tie; motion failed and b will not be included in the draft report.

- Recommendation c (incorporate lines 6.2–6.24 of amendment double 0077 and expand grade coverage to grades 1–12): roll call 7 ayes, 5 nos, 4 absent — motion carried; c will be included in the draft report.

- Recommendation d (require MDE to provide an oral translation of the notice of procedural safeguards): roll call 6 ayes, 6 nos, 4 absent — tie; motion failed.

- Recommendation e (direct MDE or the legislature to evaluate whether eliminating seclusion increased restrictive physical holds and require evaluation for trauma): roll call 6 ayes, 6 nos, 4 absent — tie; motion failed.

Next procedural step: the working group will meet Jan. 28 to vote on outstanding benchmarks (paragraph a) and to adopt a final draft report for the legislature. The above outcomes reflect roll calls and statements recorded in the Jan. 21 meeting transcript.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source