Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nonprofit MicroLife Institute presents 'gentle density' housing concepts for Windsor/Osborne and Claremont sites
Summary
MicroLife Institute showed conceptual designs for the Windsor/Osborne roundabout assemblage and a city-owned Claremont Road parcel, proposing cottage courts, row houses and small commercial space to add missing-middle housing and neighborhood-serving retail while preserving neighborhood scale.
Will Johnston, executive director of MicroLife Institute, told the council the nonprofit is proposing ‘naturally affordable’ housing typologies — smaller lots, smaller footprints and gentle density — as alternatives to townhomes and large single-family homes.
For the Windsor/Osborne assemblage of about 14 parcels, MicroLife described a quadrant-based concept with small commercial uses, pedestrian courtyards, on-street-facing row houses and buffer single-family cottages on adjacent residential streets to reduce commercial spillover. “We wanted to make this feel really human scale,” a MicroLife presenter said, noting the approach balances specificity for developers with enough flexibility for projects to pencil.
On the 3826 Claremont Road city-owned parcel, the team proposed a cottage court in the rear, shared parking and a corner commercial/live-work building on Claremont, with missing-middle housing types between the corridor and the adjacent residential neighborhood.
MicroLife said the Claremont concept was run through a typical pro forma and is financially plausible for mission-driven development; the Windsor/Osborne plan was described as a flexible design framework that still needs developer-level financial modeling. The firm also cited a recent example of an 18-unit cottage court using TAD funding through an entity described in the presentation as 'Decide2Cab' to provide low-cost construction loans and silent second mortgages to support affordability in mixed-income projects.
Councilmembers welcomed the design approach but asked about implementation constraints (fire turnarounds, connectivity and detailed engineering) and whether missing-middle products would be affordable to public employees such as police officers; MicroLife said rental or targeted homeownership policy choices would be council decisions.
No zoning or land-use votes were taken; the presentation was framed as conceptual and staff said they will continue to refine feasibility and implementation options with MicroLife.
