Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Landmarks Commission backs amendment to allow up to two nonresident experts, refers proposal to planning
Summary
The commission voted to recommend a text amendment allowing up to two nonresident members who own property or operate businesses in Sandusky and provide required expertise, added a preference for local residents and approved language to allow people with a 'substantial connection' to apply; the measure will go to Planning Commission on April 23.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Sandusky Landmark Commission voted March 19 to forward a proposed text amendment to the planning and zoning code that would permit up to two commission members to reside outside city limits if they own property or operate a business in Sandusky and provide professional expertise (architecture, history, planning, archaeology or related fields).
Planner Erin said staff reviewed ordinances from 10 similar Ohio cities and found a range of approaches: some allow nonresident members when they have property or business interests, others require all members be city residents. The proposed draft (included in the packet) would create a limited exception to the current residency rule to expand access to expertise.
Commissioners debated two additions. First, several members asked for a clause giving preference to local residents; one motion to add that preference (with final text to be drafted by the law director) was moved, seconded and approved on roll call. Second, commissioners discussed whether to add language to permit applicants with a defined "substantial connection" to Sandusky — for example, a previous resident, alumnus, or someone with long‑standing local ties — to be eligible even if they do not own property or a business. Members expressed concern about how to define 'substantial connection' but also said the city commission and planning commission would have further review and final authority. The motion to add 'substantial connection' language passed on a subsequent roll call (one commissioner recorded a 'no').
Erin said the revised draft will be sent to Planning Commission and is scheduled for Planning Commission’s April 23 agenda; the City Commission retains final adoption authority.

