Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hooper council discusses meeting schedule, agenda deadlines and public‑comment rules
Summary
Council debated changing meeting times and formalizing agenda deadlines (requests due by the Wednesday prior) and discussed whether public comment should be at the start or end of meetings; members emphasized transparency and time for staff and council to research agenda items.
Hooper — During the Jan. 22 work session councilmembers considered internal governance changes including meeting times, frequency, agenda deadlines and public‑comment procedures.
Chair (Speaker 5) opened a conversation on holding fewer meetings and potentially moving work meetings earlier, proposing a 6 p.m. start rather than 7 p.m. Several members asked that agenda item requests be submitted at least eight days before a meeting (the Wednesday prior) so staff, council and the public have adequate time to research and review proposals.
Why it matters: Councilmembers said advance notice supports transparency and gives their city attorney and staff time to prepare opinions. Several members said being surprised by last‑minute agenda items undermines public trust and the ability to provide thoughtful votes.
Key procedural points
• Meeting schedule: Council discussed changing their code language that currently requires at least two meetings per month. Several members favored keeping a single regular meeting with an additional meeting as needed.
• Start time: Council considered starting at 6:00 p.m. or 6:30 p.m. to accommodate work schedules; members asked staff to verify availability for those times.
• Agenda deadlines: The mayor and staff were asked to encourage department heads and council members to submit agenda items by the Wednesday the week prior to publication so packet preparation and legal review can occur.
• Public comment: Members debated whether to take public comment at the beginning or end of meetings. Most favored preserving a public comment slot but limiting council back‑and‑forth during that time to avoid impromptu debates and to ensure comments are heard without immediate deliberation.
Other items
The council discussed continuing a tradition of a pledge and brief devotional at meetings, with some members noting the practice is common in similar cities. Council liaisons gave updates on external agency meetings, and the next work meeting will include an introduction from a state administrative assistant to discuss moderate‑income housing work.
Next step
Council asked staff to draft proposed ordinance/code edits and a meeting schedule for the body to consider at a future meeting; no formal motion was made at the session.
