Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hooper City Council debates agenda notice, quorum and council liaison roles at Jan. 8 work meeting
Summary
At its Jan. 8 work meeting the Hooper City Council discussed updating meeting notice rules, clarifying quorum requirements under state code, and assigning council liaisons to outside boards and planning reviews; one member urged "full transparency" on agenda items.
At a Jan. 8 work meeting, the Hooper City Council reviewed internal procedures including agenda-notice timelines, council assignments and coordination with the planning and technical review processes.
Speaker 6 urged the council to give members, staff and residents more advance notice of agenda items, saying, "full transparency...Nobody should be getting surprised of what's coming on the agenda a few days beforehand" and emphasizing the need for time to consult legal counsel and staff.
The mayoral or presiding speaker (Speaker 1) asked the council to review a draft of the council schedule and a longer set of procedural rules that have not been updated in more than 10 years. Staff proposed posting agendas a week in advance and adopting a deadline for submissions (the week before a meeting) so items are not added at the last minute.
Members discussed quorum rules after training material and the city's code appeared to differ. Speaker 3 noted the training shows a six-member council requires three members for a quorum while an older text in the city’s procedure indicated a different number; Speaker 1 stated the council needs three members to form a quorum under the cited state code. The transcript also included a reference to "Title 10, Section 8" when discussing membership on the technical review committee.
Council members agreed to have staff circulate planning commission agendas so council liaisons can spot subdivision items and technical issues early. The group discussed assigning individual council members to attend outside meetings (for example, the legislative policy committee and volunteer/civic groups) and report back in the interest of continuity and oversight.
What happens next: Staff will circulate the draft updated procedures and proposed meeting schedule and return recommended changes to a future work meeting for further review and possible referral to legal counsel for formal ordinance or policy updates.
