Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildland Urban Interface topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Holladay staff outline state's WUI requirements and urge adoption of SCS 5+ map

Holladay City Council · October 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and Unified Fire presenters told the council that House Bill 48 requires municipalities to adopt a Wildland-Urban Interface map and related building-code changes by Jan. 1; staff recommended starting the city's map at the state's SCS score of 5 and above while allowing future adjustments and public input.

City staff and Unified Fire officials used a work session on Oct. 23 to brief the Holladay City Council on House Bill 48, the state law that requires municipalities to adopt a Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) map and corresponding building-code updates.

The briefing, led by John (city staff technical lead) and supported by Chief Watkins and Unified Fire personnel, said the state's structure-exposure-score (SCS) dataset (URAP) is the metric the state will use and recommended that the city adopt a map beginning at SCS 5 and above to be eligible for state cooperative assistance and reimbursement in the event of a large wildfire. Staff emphasized the statutory deadline: local adoption of the map and the Title 13 code changes must be complete to align with the state timeline.

Why it matters: adopting the map creates where the WUI building code applies. Within mapped areas, homeowners and remodelers may face additional building standards and defensible-space requirements; those standards can affect remodel timing, landscaping (including tree canopy), and possible assessed fees tied to the state's program. Staff said mitigation work (defensible space, water supply/hydrant flows) can reduce required building upgrades and fee exposure.

Council discussion focused on where to draw the boundary. Staff presented a "dark yellow" (SCS 5+) band and a looser "light blue" option that would capture adjacent areas where residents and elected members showed concern. Some council members favored adopting the SCS 5-and-above footprint now and revisiting boundaries after public engagement; others urged caution about imposing additional burdens on long-standing neighborhoods and tree-canopy goals.

Staff said the state rules (currently in draft) will add specificity before Jan. 1. They also noted options for the city: adopt the 5+ baseline to secure eligibility for state support, then refine the map with clearer geographic boundaries (streets, natural features) and public feedback; or pursue a narrower or broader footprint, understanding that fee implications and mitigation responsibilities would vary.

Next steps: staff will take direction to the planning commission for a public hearing the following week, gather homeowner feedback (postcard mailing to affected areas already underway) and return to council with a recommended ordinance and clearer map boundaries ahead of the legal deadline.