Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Conservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge city to protect sandhill parcel next to Mayfield Dog Park from development

Bonita Springs City Council · December 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple residents told the council the unimproved parcel adjacent to the Mayfield Dog Park contains rare sandhill habitat and native plants (including Asclepias tomentosa) and urged zoning it as preserve/passive parkland instead of building sports fields; speakers cited groundwater recharge and existing nearby sports facilities.

Dozens of minutes of public comment focused on a small unimproved parcel adjacent to the Mayfield Dog Park (East Terry/Matheson area). Multiple residents told council the land contains a rare sandhill ecosystem and native plants and urged the city to formally protect it as passive parkland.

Rachel Brown, a resident, called attention to species she said are found in only "2 to 3 locations in Lee County," and asked council to "permanently fix the status of the lot next to the dog park before anyone else tries to develop this fragile ecosystem." She named the native milkweed Asclepias tomentosa as one species of concern. Other speakers — including James Anderson, Conrad Eggers and Amanda Muzzy — made similar arguments, citing groundwater recharge, the presence of turkey oaks and the fact that the city already has nearby soccer fields.

Speakers asked that the city zone remaining untouched downtown land as preserve/passive parks and to look for lower-impact alternatives (benches, wildlife information boards). One speaker referenced state legislation (HB 209) in support of protecting native habitat in state parks, and urged the council to continue a bipartisan momentum toward conservation. The council did not make a zoning decision during public comment but heard repeated requests to include the parcels in future planning analyses.

Next steps: the item remains in public-comment stage; residents requested that staff evaluate preservation and zoning options and return with proposals.