Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts running‑at‑large changes, asks staff to clarify hunting‑dog language
Summary
Supervisors adopted amendments to running‑at‑large and leash ordinances to allow year‑round enforcement outside active hunting exemptions and directed staff to refine the hunting‑dog definition to align with Virginia Code.
The King William County Board of Supervisors voted to adopt amendments to the county’s running‑at‑large and leash ordinances while directing staff to refine language that addresses hunting‑dog exceptions.
Staff presented call‑data maps for 2024–2025 showing widespread animal‑control complaints across the county and argued that year‑round enforcement (outside established hunting‑season exceptions) would help reduce nuisance and public‑safety incidents. Deputies said they work with hunt clubs and generally do not pursue active, collared hunting dogs, but the board recognized the hunting issue as a potential point of contention.
Supervisors asked staff to make the ordinance’s hunting‑dog language illustrative and to reference the Virginia Code so it does not contradict state law. Board members emphasized the importance of being explicit about active hunting seasons, tracking collars and organized hunts so lawful hunters are not inadvertently penalized. Staff agreed to compare draft language to the Virginia Code and to add clarifying guidance for deputies and the public.
The board approved the ordinance with those caveats and asked staff to return with refined definitions and examples to be included in ordinance guidance or an explanatory statement.
