Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors split over interim finance director, question candidate qualifications and rate
Summary
Board debated a proposed interim finance director from the Berkeley Group (Julie Kaylor) and whether to approve a short-term work order at about $150'$160/hour; supervisors expressed deep concern about qualifications, called for renegotiation or alternative candidates and directed staff to continue seeking options.
The board spent extensive time debating a proposed work order to hire an interim finance director through the Berkeley Group.
County staff presented a proposed work order for Julie Kaylor to provide interim finance services up to 16 hours per week for up to four months at a stated hourly rate (discussion in the meeting ranged around $150'$160/hr). Staff said funds could come from the line item for the former finance director and recommended approval to help the county stabilize finances and start audit work.
Several supervisors said they supported bringing immediate help into the finance office because departments are operating without clear financial line items and staff need support; others questioned whether the proposed candidate's résumé demonstrated sufficient formal accounting credentials. "I would like to have seen somebody who's got an accounting degree at least," one supervisor said, and another called the proposed hourly rate "fiscally irresponsible" for someone who, as described in the packet, lacks a formal degree.
Board members offered alternatives: ask Berkeley to provide different candidates, attempt to negotiate the hourly rate, or continue with the proposed short-term arrangement while pursuing a permanent finance director. The meeting record shows supervisors were divided; staff was directed to continue negotiations with the Berkeley Group, consider rechecking candidate options, and continue advertising for a permanent finance director. No final long-term hire was approved at this meeting.
Supervisors also approved other procurement motions during the meeting: authorization to proceed with a reassessment vendor (Vision) once contract terms are negotiated, and authorization for the county administrator to execute an audit contract with the recommended firm once negotiated by the county attorney.
