Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Board approves setback variances for Paseo De Vaca addition in Santa Rita neighborhood

San Angelo Zoning Board of Adjustment · February 3, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Zoning Board approved a 10-foot rear setback in lieu of 20 feet for garage and sunroom additions at a Paseo De Vaca property in the Santa Rita neighborhood, finding special circumstances tied to lot configuration and neighborhood character; the vote was 6-0.

The San Angelo Zoning Board of Adjustment voted 6–0 to approve setback variances for a property on Paseo De Vaca in the Santa Rita neighborhood, allowing a 10-foot rear-yard setback instead of the 20 feet ordinarily required for attached additions.

Ray Lineberry, lead planner, explained the application covers an existing garage and a proposed sunroom and pool-house addition; because the garage and new elements are attached to the principal structure they would otherwise be required to meet the 20-foot rear setback. Lineberry told the board the lot is approximately 15,000 square feet, larger than typical RS-1 lots, and staff did not find special circumstances but described the geometry and existing improvements to the board.

Bridal Dobbins, representing the contractor, argued the existing covered patio and measured separations could mean portions of the project qualify as open structures or accessory in ways that reduce setback exposure. Neighbors and the applicant’s representative discussed precedent and existing conditions on nearby lots; staff noted some older structures may have been built before current standards.

After discussion about whether the lot pattern and development in Santa Rita created a special circumstance for this parcel, a motion to approve the variances was made and seconded. The board approved the request 6–0.

The decision allows the owner to proceed with the proposed additions subject to any building-permit requirements and any planning commission referrals required for nonconforming-use extensions.