Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Court reviews procedural and substantive claims in decades-long Rockland Trust dispute
Appeals Court Oral Arguments · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.
Summary
Rockland Trust argues appeals-court review is warranted and that a short procedural misstep did not justify dismissal; respondent says Rockland failed to timely comply with appellate filing rules and many claims lack evidentiary support after decades of litigation.
Nick Nesgos, arguing for Rockland Trust, urged the appeals court to decide the merits rather than remand because the dispute has persisted since 2003 and, he said, the appellate division did not apply the correct standard in dismissing the appeal. He said a…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans
