Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears challenge to one-year extension of abuse-prevention order
Summary
Counsel for AE told an appeals panel the trial judge extended an abuse-prevention order for a year based only on law-enforcement testimony while the plaintiff, ME, was present on Zoom but denied the opportunity to testify; counsel asked the court to vacate the extension as an abuse of discretion.
Counsel for AE told the appeals court that a judge extended an abuse-prevention order for one year after a two-party hearing without taking testimony from the plaintiff, ME, who was available on Zoom but not permitted to testify. "The abuse prevention order was extended for 1 year after a 2 party hearing, without any evidence from ME," counsel said, arguing the extension relied…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
