Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveillance Flock topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Relations Commission votes to send city council letter urging non-renewal of Flock contract
Summary
The Boulder Human Relations Commission voted Feb. 9 to send a letter to City Council and the city manager urging the city not to renew its administrative contract with Flock, citing privacy, misidentification, and risks to immigrant and marginalized communities; staff will deliver the letter.
Get email alerts on the Surveillance Flock topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boulder Human Relations Commission voted on Feb. 9 to send a letter to the City Council and the city manager asking that the city decline renewal of its contract with Flock, a company that operates license-plate and related camera systems used by some law-enforcement agencies.
Commissioners voiced privacy and equity concerns, citing reports of misidentification, data security failures and the potential for surveillance to harm immigrant and other marginalized residents. Commissioner Emily said she had drafted the letter and that it includes examples of documented misuse and security problems: "I drafted a letter," she said, and asked the commission to consider sending it to council ahead of an anticipated administrative renewal in March.
Chair Aaron framed the issue as time-sensitive and noted council input could influence the city manager’s decision: "Because it doesn't go to council doesn't mean that council can't say something about it," he said. After a brief review and a short period for members to read the draft, the commission voted in favor of sending the letter. The motion passed by voice vote and staff were instructed to transmit it to City Council and city manager Nuria (the transcript records the motion and that "the ayes have it," but individual vote tallies and the motion mover/second are not recorded in the meeting transcript).
Staff confirmed they would deliver the letter and route it to relevant oversight bodies. Christian, a city staff member, said he had the council link and would facilitate getting the letter to council and the city manager: "I do have the link," he said, and confirmed he would share it.
Commissioners also discussed local ways to amplify verified information and give residents avenues for public comment. Elizabeth (staff) and others noted that the police oversight panel and community members have already raised concerns and that the commission’s letter could be accompanied by public-comment opportunities at related panels.
What's next: staff will send the approved letter to City Council and the city manager; the commission encouraged community members to use existing oversight meetings to register concerns. The transcript does not record an exact renewal date in March or a roll-call vote with names and counts.

