Rep. Roger Williams on immigration enforcement and shutdown risk: 'I don't think we're gonna shut down'
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
In an interview, Rep. Roger Williams said he does not expect a government shutdown tied to DHS/ICE funding and defended active enforcement, criticizing sanctuary cities and urging cooperation between local law enforcement and federal agencies.
Host Mark asked Rep. Roger Williams, 25th District congressman, whether the country faced another government shutdown amid controversy over ICE and immigration enforcement.
"I don't think we're gonna shut down," Williams said, adding that a recent bill had put roughly "$70,000,000,000" into relevant funding and that he saw little appetite for a shutdown over protecting the homeland. He framed refusal to fund as a political problem for those opposed to enforcement.
On incidents in Minnesota and public reaction, Williams urged cooling rhetoric and emphasized enforcement priorities. "If you're bad, if you break the law and you're a bad guy, you gotta go," he said, arguing federal and local law enforcement should cooperate to remove individuals who break laws.
Williams contrasted Minnesota with Texas, telling the host that Texas has been actively returning and deporting migrants without the same public unrest. He criticized sanctuary cities as undermining ICE operations, saying they are "illegal to begin with" and make coordination more difficult.
Why it matters: Statements from a sitting congressman about shutdown risk and enforcement reflect the policy priorities and political framing of border and immigration debates. Williams' remarks emphasize enforcement and intergovernmental cooperation; the interview did not include countervailing views or independent verification of enforcement claims.
What was not resolved: The interview presents Williams' assessment and policy preferences but does not produce specific legislative changes or decisions during the segment. Claims about the legality of sanctuary cities and the $70 billion figure were stated by Williams and were not independently verified in the interview.
The segment moved next to election strategy and small-business topics.