Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Allocation Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Columbus-backed bill narrows employee ban from Tax Allocation District investments
Summary
House Bill 609 seeks to narrow a statutory prohibition so only employees whose job responsibilities relate to redevelopment administration would be barred from investing in projects inside a tax allocation district; members accepted a friendly amendment removing the word 'primary.'
Get email alerts on the Tax Allocation Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Bill 609, introduced at the subcommittee by a representative on behalf of Columbus Consolidated Government, would modify eligibility restrictions that currently prohibit all government "employees" from engaging in investments or business activities within tax allocation districts (TADs).
The sponsor said the city passed the request unanimously and that current law is overly broad, barring even low-level employees with no role in redevelopment from participating. "So say, for instance, if someone is a maintenance guy...he could not participate...just simply because he was an employee," the presenter said, arguing the proposed language would limit the ban to employees whose job responsibilities relate to the creation or administration of redevelopment areas.
Committee members questioned which positions would remain covered. The sponsor clarified the intent to keep top-level officials who could influence redevelopment (for example, mayoral staff or chiefs of staff) under the prohibition while allowing others to participate. A member asked whether removing the word "primary" might be appropriate; the presenter accepted that friendly amendment. The motion to remove "primary" from the bill's definition was accepted in the subcommittee and members agreed to bring the amended language forward for consideration at full committee.
The bill lists signers from Columbus including Leader Hughley and Representatives Rice, Buckner and Smith. No roll-call vote on final passage occurred at the subcommittee; the item is to be refined and forwarded.

