Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City manager warns of $16M wastewater liability and low reserves; council urged to plan for 2–3 year fiscal stress

East Point City Council · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Manager Jones told council two enterprise funds (water and solid waste) are stressed and cited a $16 million wastewater-treatment liability tied to Fulton County; staff said water reserves are about $2.5 million below recommended healthy levels and asked council to prioritize replenishing reserves and long-term financial planning.

City Manager Jones presented a fiscal outlook focused on internal fiscal pressures that could affect service reliability and long-term capital planning.

Jones said the city faces a substantial liability tied to regional wastewater treatment: the most recent audit identified a $16,000,000 wastewater-treatment exposure connected to Fulton County services. Jones told council that the city will need coordinated long-term financial planning with Fulton County and an explicit strategy in the upcoming utility-rate study.

On reserves, Jones said the recommended healthy balance for the water enterprise is about $8.5 million, and recent projections show the city roughly $2.5 million below that benchmark. “That creates some concerns,” he said, noting that strained reserves reduce the ability to flatten rate impacts and to address emergency infrastructure needs.

Jones also described operational headwinds: closing vacancies has improved continuity but increased personnel costs, and infrastructure inflation is raising project budgets (he cited a recreation-center cost increase of about $10 million for a project not yet under construction). He urged the council to identify benchmark peer cities and said staff would provide more comparable data and one-on-one briefings with council members.

Council members pressed for more granular numbers and earlier distribution of presentation materials so members could review the data before meetings. Several asked staff to supply a multi-year fiscal impact analysis and the demographic counts needed to model policy choices, such as the proposed change to senior homestead exemptions.

Jones said staff will return with more detailed fund-balance and comparative analytics and urged the council to prioritize reserve replenishment and to expect budget tradeoffs in the coming fiscal cycles.