Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lighting Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission Continues Outdoor Lighting Text Amendment After Substantive Debate
Summary
The Planning Commission continued a public hearing on a proposed outdoor lighting code that would add residential lighting standards (lumens, fixture housing, pole heights and Kelvin/color range) to allow staff to narrow numeric color‑temperature requirements and clarify the definition and enforcement of light trespass.
The Holiday City Planning Commission continued its public hearing on an outdoor lighting text amendment Feb. 18 after an extended discussion of scope, enforceability and technical details.
Staff described the draft ordinance as adding residential lighting standards (new section 1384050) to address light trespass, lumens, fixture heights and color temperature. "There are some elements in here that the planning commission could use... we've updated some terminology and provide additional guidance for parking light pole heights and how far a parking lot light standard should be from a residential property line," staff said.
Commissioners broadly supported the "dark‑skies" intent but raised several concerns. One commissioner warned that strict rules focused on light color or brightness might drive property owners to erect fences or walls to contain light. Another urged the commission to adopt a short, objective definition of "light trespass"—similar to how audible nuisance is defined—so both neighbors and enforcement officers have a clear, enforceable standard.
Technical and implementation questions dominated the discussion. Staff explained compliance would typically be triggered by new construction, land‑use expansions or installations requiring building inspection; single‑family homeowners would generally not be required to hire a lighting engineer and could submit cut sheets to show fixture compliance. Commissioners asked whether ordinary maintenance (for example, reroofing) would trigger requirements; staff said routine maintenance would not, but demolition, expansion or new fixtures tied to building permits could.
Several commissioners recommended narrowing the initial draft to focus on objective, enforceable items—fixture type and shielding, limiting light trespass onto private property rather than onto the street, and maximum fixture heights—while deferring strict Kelvin (color temperature) limits until staff can present an implementation plan and clear cut‑sheet guidance for homeowners.
Motion and next steps Chair moved and Commissioner Prince seconded a motion to continue the hearing to the commission's next meeting so staff can revise the draft to better clarify trespass language (property vs. street), simplify enforcement language, and consider removing or softening numeric Kelvin ranges for initial deployment. The motion passed by recorded vote.
What to expect Staff will return with revisions that emphasize objective standards (fixture shielding/housing, maximum pole heights, and clear definition of light trespass), provide guidance on when the code applies, and include sample cut sheets or figures to help homeowners and staff determine compliance.
