Citizen Portal
Sign In

Committee passes cyberstalking bill after debate on overlap with existing stalking laws

Senate Courts of Justice Committee · February 9, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reported SB 673, a substitute creating a cyberstalking offense and raising penalties in some cases; members debated whether the measure duplicates existing stalking provisions and whether new 'actual knowledge' language and protective-order clarifications are necessary.

Senator Mulcahy presented a substitute to add cyberstalking provisions and to adjust sentencing in certain circumstances, including raising some violations to felonies where conduct occurs in violation of a protective order and results in bodily injury. Members questioned whether the draft duplicates existing stalking statutes and whether specific elements (frequency, timing, ‘actual knowledge’) simply recast current law.

Alan Nash (Commonwealth’s Attorney) and other supporters said the substituted language fills case-law gaps by clarifying factors judges can consider and by recognizing that electronic conduct can cause a reasonable fear of bodily harm. Nash added that some magistrates had previously refused protective remedies where harassment was principally electronic and not physically proximate.

Opponents and some committee members warned about duplication, potential overlap and confusion with existing statutes, and the risk of creating conflicting or redundant charges. After debate and limited amendments, the committee reported SB 673; the transcript records the committee report vote as "Your bill passes 12 to 3."