Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rulemaking Sb776 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves technical rule changes to align regulations with SB 776 and remove obsolete provisions
Summary
The board authorized staff to file four section‑100 rulemaking packages: repeal of an obsolete foreign‑graduate sponsorship regulation, repeal of corporate/branch‑office rules, NBEO Part 3 name updates, and mobile optometric office rule changes (remove 12‑permit cap; require annual reporting).
The California State Board of Optometry voted to direct staff to file four section‑100 regulatory changes to clean up obsolete text and align rule language with statute, including changes tied to Senate Bill 776.
The executive officer told the board the first repeal addresses a confusing regulatory provision that historically allowed foreign‑graduate sponsorship, but which no longer exists in statute. He said boards still receive inquiries from foreign graduates and the regulation's removal will clear confusion.
Additional technical edits include removal of corporate‑application and branch‑office regulatory text that are obsolete following earlier statutory changes, updating the National Board Part 3 exam name to the statute’s current phrasing, and amending mobile optometric office (MOO) permit rules to remove the former 12‑permit cap and require annual reporting in line with SB 776.
A motion to approve staff action on these section‑100 filings passed on a roll‑call vote. Staff emphasized these are technical, non‑substantive changes to bring regulation text into alignment with statute and business processes. The board noted the changes will reduce applicant confusion and improve internal clarity.
