Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advisory Opinions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics commission adopts advisory opinions on letterhead, raffle prize and post‑employment limits
Summary
The Commission on Ethics adopted advisory opinions allowing a commissioner to use self‑created letterhead with disclaimers, clarifying raffle winnings are not always gifts, and applying a two‑year post‑employment restriction in a DOC contracting context. Staff added a caveat about including official contact information on private endorsements.
At its public meeting the Florida Commission on Ethics adopted a set of advisory opinions clarifying several common questions for public officers.
Letterhead and endorsements: Staff presented file 2824 addressing whether a Manatee County commissioner could use county letterhead to endorse a candidate. The commission adopted the opinion with an added caveat: while a public officer may self‑identify and may use privately created stationery for an endorsement, including official county contact information (address, phone, website or public email) at the bottom of a private endorsement "could invite the future use of public resources" and would not be protected by the commission’s guidance. The staff presenter told commissioners the use of county‑provided letterhead for private endorsements is prima facie inconsistent with the proper performance of duties.
Raffle prize: Staffer Michael Terry presented file 2826 about whether a raffle prize won after purchasing tickets (a 7‑night Cape Cod stay valued at $2,850) constituted a reportable gift. Terry said the transaction "does not appear to be a gift, but rather a purchase of the chance to win a prize" and recommended the requester may accept the prize. The commission adopted that draft opinion.
Post‑employment limits: In file 2828 staff reviewed post‑public employment restrictions for a former Department of Corrections senior psychologist, Dr. Jennifer Jimenez, who is considering work for Centurion, the DOC’s statewide contracted health services provider. Staff concluded, based on section 112.3185(4), that because Dr. Jimenez audited Centurion‑provided services while at DOC, she would be prohibited for two years from performing work "in connection with" Centurion’s DOC contract. The commission adopted the draft opinion as written. Staff also provided preliminary guidance (file 2829) for a DOC secretary considering future employment, noting representation and lobbying bans and the procurement‑based restrictions that can apply depending on facts.
Each adopted opinion was accompanied by staff explanations of statutory limits and recommended text edits where commissioners requested clarifications. The commission voted to adopt the set of opinions as recorded in the meeting minutes.
