Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sb456 Self Distribution topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Georgia Senate committee hears bill to allow limited self-distribution by small breweries

Senate Regulated Utilities Committee · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Senate Regulated Utilities Committee hearing on Senate Bill 456 focused on removing Georgia's 288-ounce off-premise cap and permitting limited same-county self-distribution (1,000 barrels locally, 6,000 barrels annual cap across locations). Brewers said the changes help small businesses; wholesalers, retailers and public-health groups warned of risks to the three-tier system and public safety. No vote was taken.

At a hearing of the Senate Regulated Utilities Committee, senators heard testimony on Senate Bill 456, which would strike a statutory 288-ounce per-person off-premise cap and authorize limited self-distribution by small breweries in the county where they operate.

Supporters said the measure would give small, often rural, craft brewers a practical way to build demand and attract wholesalers. "SB 456 makes practical, targeted updates that help small brewers survive and grow without tearing down the system," said Spencer Nicks, co-founder and CEO of Reformation Brewery in Cherokee County, which he said produces about 4,000 barrels a year with roughly 2,500 barrels going through distributors.

Backers told the committee the bill creates a narrow, county-limited exception that would allow a brewer to sell up to 1,000 barrels locally and would preserve state oversight. "It gives small businesses just enough room to breathe, just enough flexibility to build demand, to build brands," Nicks said, and he urged senators to advance the bill from committee for further consideration.

Opponents — including wholesalers, retailers and public-health advocates — warned that the proposal, as written, could create loopholes that let brewers bypass the franchise and territory structure that underpins Georgia's three-tier distribution system. Martin Smith of the Georgia Beer Wholesalers Association said the bill's small-brewer definition could reach most Georgia brewers and allow them to "cherry-pick" prime retail accounts. "What this bill as it's currently written does . . . is it creates a new exemption to the three-tier system," Smith said.

Retail representatives made a similar argument. Stoney McGill of the Georgia Alcohol Dealers Association said the existing system gives small retail stores parity with larger chains through wholesaler service obligations; county-limited direct sales by brewers, he warned, would undermine that balance.

Public-health testimony focused on accessibility and harm. Michael Mumper of the Georgia Alcohol Prevention Alliance cited national and state alcohol-related death statistics and said the three-tier system promotes tax collection, age enforcement and an orderly marketplace. "When you go directly from manufacturer to retailer, yes," he said, "that means more alcohol is going to be drank."

Industry witnesses described compliance and enforcement mechanisms. Thomas Monti, a brewery owner from Marietta, explained that producers track product from production coolers, account monthly for excise taxes and report to the Department of Revenue, which he said makes monitoring the 1,000-barrel cap administratively feasible.

National trade testimony said limited self-distribution operates successfully elsewhere. Sam DeWitt, State Government Affairs Director for the Brewers Association, said 38 states allow some form of self-distribution and that capped local sales have provided a pathway for small brands to prove demand and later attract wholesalers.

Committee members asked detailed questions about how the local boundary would be defined (the bill references county boundaries) and whether a principal-place-of-business requirement or other limits would be appropriate to prevent brewers from serving multiple jurisdictions. The sponsor and witnesses said they were open to tightening the language around principal place of business and to other committee edits.

The hearing produced no vote. Chairman Collisert asked members to submit proposed amendments if they wanted the bill brought back and said he did not expect SB 456 to return to the committee this week. The committee adjourned with no formal action taken on the measure.