Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers debate whether more beds or more treatment will reduce Colorado prison population
Summary
House members spent the longest portion of the caucus briefing on the Department of Corrections: JBC leaders asked caucus to fund immediate bed and medical costs while many members pressed for policy changes — parole decisions, community corrections acceptance, workforce and treatment investments — as long-term solutions.
Lawmakers used the caucus briefing to press the Joint Budget Committee on the Department of Corrections supplemental, focusing on whether the state should fund more prison beds now or prioritize treatment, parole and community corrections capacities to reduce incarceration over time.
Representative Brown and Chair Sirota explained that the DOC supplemental requests include about $29,000,000 in additional general‑fund spending for increased medical caseloads, outside medical and mental‑health contracts, roughly $3,000,000 in payments to local jails and private prisons, and approximately $2,400,000 for prison caseload and food services. "When inmates are sent to the system, it is the state's responsibility, to pay for the cost to to house them, here," Chair Sirota said while presenting the DOC package.
Members pushed back: Representative Carter and others argued that repeatedly funding beds without commensurate investment in community corrections, reentry services and evidence‑based treatment is ineffective. Representative Carter said the state pays about "$56,000 per person per year" to house someone in DOC and urged redirecting funds toward supports that make parole viable and reduce recidivism. Several members cited low acceptance rates by community corrections programs — one county’s comcore acceptance rate was described as around 18 percent — and questioned why beds are added when comcore and parole pathways are underutilized.
JBC response and constraints: Brown and Chair Sirota said some of the pressure stems from existing statutes and past legislative choices that increased prison populations and changed technical‑violation sentences; they noted a third‑party audit suggesting DOC may be underfunded in the way its beds and services are financed. Brown said the JBC initially denied some DOC requests earlier in the year to force administrative engagement and emphasized that a comprehensive approach is needed — including workforce recruitment, changes at the parole board level and better utilization of community corrections beds.
What remains unresolved: The caucus did not take formal action. Members directed staff and JBC leaders to continue negotiations with the executive branch, the parole board and local community corrections programs to craft a more comprehensive strategy before long‑bill decisions.
Representative attributions in this article are drawn from the caucus discussion and follow the meeting transcript.
