Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Independent Pay Commission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independent pay commission sets member salary at $50,802 starting 2027 and raises interim per diem; legal limits constrain immediate changes
Summary
The independent elected official pay commission recommended a base member salary of $50,802 effective Jan. 1, 2027, increased interim per diem levels, and indexed future adjustments to inflation; legal counsel warned the General Assembly faces constitutional limits on changing salaries during current terms.
Get email alerts on the Independent Pay Commission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Directors DeCicco and Castle presented the independent elected official pay commission report produced under House Bill 24-1059. The commission’s methodology used a third-party market analysis to benchmark peer states and adjusted for local labor costs. As written in statute, the commission’s recommendations set the member base salary at $50,802 effective Jan. 1, 2027, and require automatic inflation indexing in subsequent years.
The report also recommended raising interim member per diem from $99 to $193 (an inflation-adjusted increase with a 25% haircut from the full index) and increasing certain leadership per diems (for example, per-diem pay for filling in for the governor would rise to $100 from $20). For most statewide elected-official salaries, the commission targeted roughly the 25th percentile of the market distribution, with the Attorney General’s benchmark tied to market salaries for experienced associate attorneys (about $170,000).
Fiscal estimates: the full-year fiscal impact is concentrated in FY2028; staff estimated a roughly $400,000 fiscal impact in the full year (about a 1.5% increase over current appropriations), while FY2027 shows a modest half-year impact. Legal staff highlighted constitutional limits on changing salaries during an official’s term (Article V, Section 6) and noted per diem changes are not subject to the same restriction; travel-reimbursement changes would need to be applied consistently across state actors if implemented.
The committee heard the briefing and legal analysis and did not take immediate action at the meeting.
